CIOCOO
Resources for CIO and COO professionals

Testing Cloud Service performance

May 28th 2010 in CIO, cloud computing, testing

If you are contemplating hosting some of your applications and data in one of the large public clouds, you are probably wondering what the performance and availability is like.

Up to now, the only way has been to trust the vendors claims or to sign-up to the services and test them yourself.

If you are considering hosting your application(s) with a cloud service provider …. read this first.

There is now a service that compares the performance and availability of some of the larger solution providers such as Rackspace, Amazon, Google and Microsoft Azure. In a future release, they plan to add the capability for you to test your preferred supplier.

Image of Cloud Computing, A Practical Approach

The service deploys the same application to each of the service providers in their different locations. They are them tested from over 100,000 desktops, linked to over 2,500 ISPs in 168 different countries. You can see the availability percentage and the response times in a variety of views.

It’s interesting to see Microsoft Azure consistently at or near the top, with Amazon EC2 Ireland and Singapore lagging behind.

  • Over a 30 day period, Microsoft Azure’s typical response time is 0.63 seconds from Chicago, 8.44 from London and 40.55 from Mumbai.
  • Amazon EC2 hosted in Singapore has response times of 5.89 from Tokyo up-to 40.52 from Boston USA.

These differences in latency are a real eye-opener. If you are considering hosting your application(s) with a cloud service provider, make sure you visit this site first. If your preferred provider isn’t listed, make sure you test it yourself before making the big move.

Click here to try out the CloudSleuth service.

Image of Cloud Computing Explained: Implementation Handbook for Enterprises

Also read ….




required



required - won't be displayed


Your Comment:

There are many many articles written extolling the benefits of ‘cloud technology’. However, most of these are written by a supplier or specialised consultant – meaning they aren’t independent. Here are some real-life benefits of using the technology and some advice.

Previous Entry

Japanese Bank migrates to IBM’s cloud-based desktop service. Could this be the start of financial institutions adopting the technology?

Next Entry

Recommended reading
Image of Jurisdiction and the Internet: Regulatory Competence over Online Activity